<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>jessenoller.com comments - Latest Comments in &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://pyjesse.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:52:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-548631</link><description>Do you have any use cases or examples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improvements you'd like to see to the module itself?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-548626</link><description>Yes, but most people have it open in a new tab.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-547837</link><description>Excellent ! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would be glad to see pyprocessing enter the standard lib. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We use it and it is a great module. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, a bit more exposure cannot hurt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LBarret</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-545046</link><description>I like it, ran some good tests.  Look forward to seeing this built in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PKKid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:56:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-544817</link><description>open link in new window makes baby jesus cry</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rektide</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:22:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-543890</link><description>Thanks. I actually scrapped the one I had written and re-wrote it from scratch last week. The first one wasn't efficient enough</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Final&amp;#8221; Draft of Processing inclusion PEP &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/#comment-543725</link><description>I just read the PEP.  nice work ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corey Goldberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>