<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>jessenoller.com comments - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-e58cc5ca" type="application/json"/><link>http://pyjesse.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://pyjesse.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:21:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Porting to Python 3: An offer for you.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/09/porting-to-python-3-an-offer-for-you/#comment-398648271</link><description>It looks like there is a note on the poll now about how to remove packages that are ported already.  Some of the packages have been removed already.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">renesd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Porting to Python 3: An offer for you.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/09/porting-to-python-3-an-offer-for-you/#comment-398637385</link><description>Yeah, an update to put (ported) next to those ones that are ported already.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The projects on there get a lot of confusion based on that old, and mostly incorrect poll.  It's damaging to the reputation of those projects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If there is a hg repo somewhere I can make a patch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">renesd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 In Review: The Python Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-python-portion/#comment-397890311</link><description>Amazing job bro. Keep it up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397609285</link><description>I eat as much organic as I can afford, which given the price, isn't a lot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397607738</link><description>Hope you eat (mosly!) organic...sure do for the Kid!.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:23:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397593410</link><description>I'm happy with the timing - my goal is a consistent 6 minute mile by PyCon</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:53:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397591805</link><description>I also had a kid in 2011 and I've been a wreck for much of the year, constantly losing sleep over our 100% healthy boy. Congrats on not just surviving a tough year -- but flourishing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:49:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397586996</link><description>4.2 miles in 30 min is like a 7 minute mile !   wowee that's amazing.   very inspiring photos, geeks can be the most intransigent about fundamental change to eating/exercise habits..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zzzeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397580893</link><description>best on 2012.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corey Goldberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:26:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2011 in review: The Personal Portion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/30/2011-in-review-the-personal-portion/#comment-397472083</link><description>Best 2011 wrap up I've read! (And I've read lots.) Grats on your weight loss and your great family. Good luck in 2012 and beyond!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alanthonyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Porting to Python 3: An offer for you.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/12/09/porting-to-python-3-an-offer-for-you/#comment-383283137</link><description>Great! A propos: Is there some easy way to ask for a refresh of the py3k poll ?. At least to prevent voting  already ported libraries?. Many of the listed libraries have already py3k ports (matplotlib, PIL, pyramid, pygame to name a few). In fact in its actual state the poll is counter-productive because gives a wrong view of the actual state of the thing. (I'm tired of answering "the library X has had python 3 distributions from many months ago" in mail lists)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joaquin Abian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:07:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Standing Desk Experiment, 5 Months in.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/09/16/the-standing-desk-experiment-5-months-in/#comment-328184106</link><description>I love my standing desk, too.  You aren't weird for dancing/doing yoga while you work - I catch myself doing the same things! It is just the freedom of standing.  Try putting some bed risers under your home desk.  It brought mine right into standing range.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wrote about this same topic at: &lt;a href="http://spinnergal.blogspot.com/2011/10/standing-desks-and-back-pain.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://spinnergal.blogspot.com...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neenie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:30:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Standing Desk Experiment, 5 Months in.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/09/16/the-standing-desk-experiment-5-months-in/#comment-319885611</link><description>Very interesting! Thanks for the write-up. I wouldn't mind switching to a setup like this. A developer at a company next door to where I work has a similar set-up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mdpatrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Standing Desk Experiment, 5 Months in.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/09/16/the-standing-desk-experiment-5-months-in/#comment-318653547</link><description>I see the Geek table goes up to 47" height;  I got an adjustable table from Ikea for home some years ago.  It doesn't quite let me stand (will go to 38"), but is higher.  The idea of it:  like two adjustable height saw horses holding up a table top.   Also, a simple idea for home (which might get you close) is a bar table, along the lines of which will get you to 40" (some birch yoga blocks under the legs could adjust that +3" or +5").&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just curious (and I know I'm taller, Jesse) - what height did your desktop settle in at?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yarko Tymciurak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Standing Desk Experiment, 5 Months in.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/09/16/the-standing-desk-experiment-5-months-in/#comment-318319309</link><description>thanks, fixed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Standing Desk Experiment, 5 Months in.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/09/16/the-standing-desk-experiment-5-months-in/#comment-318107205</link><description>I think you've got a typo in the first paragraph. "More stud­ies have been com­ing out cit­ing that STANDING as long as we (pro­gram­mers, writ­ers, etc) do...". That "standing" probably has to be "sitting"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reinout van Rees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Standing Desk Experiment, 5 Months in.</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/09/16/the-standing-desk-experiment-5-months-in/#comment-317643837</link><description>Thanks for the followup post.  Very interesting.  Inspired by your first post, I tried it out, with this hacky setup (worked, but I don't know if I would *recommend* it):  &lt;a href="http://www.wordsinboxes.com/2011/07/on-switching-to-standing-desk.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wordsinboxes.com/20...&lt;/a&gt;.  I have a real adjustable desk now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsulak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help needed: multiprocessing</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/08/24/help-needed-multiprocessing/#comment-296772293</link><description>I wish I could help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least, please let me thank you for your work on multiprocessing. It's been a life saver for me in a couple of occasions, and every time I use it I keep thinking: this module is awesome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juanjo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help needed: multiprocessing</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/08/24/help-needed-multiprocessing/#comment-294645926</link><description>You are being way, way too hard on yourself!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help needed: multiprocessing</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/08/24/help-needed-multiprocessing/#comment-294508433</link><description>Uhm, I just want to say thanks for your work on the module. I don't know how I would have done my PhD without it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jorgen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help needed: multiprocessing</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/08/24/help-needed-multiprocessing/#comment-294472901</link><description>FWIW, Jesse, as someone who has released (and subsequently abandoned or deprecated) lots of code, coping with indignant bug reports is often a painful and unrewarding process.  Open source entitlement culture is a real problem, and contributes heavily to developer burnout I think.   I have taken to saying "sorry for the convenience" a lot lately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But at least in this case there are talented people who appear to care and are willing to contribute, so I think you're right to sort of let go of the reins a bit and try to find someone with more time and energy.  I think it's great that you got the ball rolling in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris McDonough</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Python/Developer tips for OSX Lion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/07/30/quick-pythondeveloper-tips-for-osx-lion/#comment-273015014</link><description>Thanks for the clarification!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niklas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Python/Developer tips for OSX Lion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/07/30/quick-pythondeveloper-tips-for-osx-lion/#comment-272409434</link><description>Thank you for the tips :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Python/Developer tips for OSX Lion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/07/30/quick-pythondeveloper-tips-for-osx-lion/#comment-270886376</link><description>Thank you very much for this post. As both OS X Lion user and (Python) developer, I really appreciate all of your tips.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Graziotin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 13:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Python/Developer tips for OSX Lion</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2011/07/30/quick-pythondeveloper-tips-for-osx-lion/#comment-270713123</link><description>Nope!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
